The first question from the September 6th webcast, could you give us input on how a Geneva 2-type of conference can be convened to reach a peace agreement on the conflict in Syria?
The third question from the August 30th webcast:
In light of the events of recent days concerning the Syrian war, LPAC wishes to re-feature this press conference from December 2012, hosted by Representative Walter Jones (R-NC) who was joined by Representative Charles Rangel (D-NY) along with retired military officers Colonel W. Patrick Lang and LTC. Anthony Shaffer, and Jeffrey Steinberg of Executive Intelligence Review.
The first question from the August 30th webcast, paraphrased, was:
An Obama action without approval would represent an impeachable crime. The British parliament does not support military action in Syria, the evidence presented for the alleged use of chemical weapons has not been confirmed, the intended Obama military action without Congressional authorization is an impeachable crime.
The seventh and final question from the August 30th Webcast:
The third question from Lyndon LaRouche's webcast of May 10th, 2013, on the implications of the Syrian crisis, as it involves Russia and the United States.
Vladimir Putin has become Russia's next President, winning nearly 65% of the vote. This is a historic victory. But, as LaRouche said last night, nothing in the strategic situation has fundamentally changed. With leaders in the USA having failed to remove Obama from office, we are in immediate danger of thermonuclear war now. Click here for LaRouche's statement in full.