Glass-Steagall: How About Some "Shock & Awe" for Wall Street?
June 21, 2012 • 8:03AM

Harlan Ullman, regarded as the author of the "shock & awe" military doctrine, is now calling for restoration of Glass-Steagall. In a UPI column, Ullman notes that "Financial markets and global economies are far from recovered and remain vulnerable to massive disruption." He goes on to say, "if this country were serious about making effective reforms to its financial system, three actions will accomplish that aim." These are: "The first is to reinstate and modernize the Glass-Steagall Banking Act of 1933 that separated commercial and investment banking. Second is to regulate by limiting (or banning) credit default swaps and Collateralized Debt Obligations. And third is to ensure that all publicly listed financial firms have an independent chairman who isn't an officer of the company."

Roddy Boyd, the author of Fatal Risk: A Cautionary Tale of AIG's Corporate Suicide, was interviewed on When he was asked about what role regulation and deregulation played in the AIG collapse, Roddy answered:

"With respect to regulation, I think it is best to note the authorities are almost always four beats behind what Wall Street is doing. Why Glass-Steagall was so important, or rather, why its elimination in November 1999 was a crucial event, was that it took away the single most important check and balance ever placed on Wall Street. When commercial banks — funding overnight via the Fed, thus, with little short-term capital constraint — were allowed to aggressively build up risk-based assets, the pressure valves were removed from the equation. Traditionally, investment banks had capital constraints and were unable to operate with high leverage for sustained periods... To compete with JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., and Bank of America Corp. — who had gobbled up I-banks and had adopted their risk-oriented cultures — Lehman, Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch ran at 30 times their equity capital (and often more). Much hilarity did not ensue. Assessing the wreckage of it all, we should be gimlet-eyed and acknowledge that B of A and Citigroup Inc. would have collapsed without government rescue (as would Merrill Lynch and AIG of course; a credible argument could be made that Goldman Sachs would have gone as well.)"

"Glass-Steagall, or some like-minded separator of commercial and investment banks, should be promptly reinstated," Boyd continued, "as our regulators and policy leaders have demonstrated an unwillingness to let these institutions die."

Former SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt, interviewed on Bloomberg TV on June 19 concerning Jamie Dimon's Congressional testimony, once again confessed: "Clearly, I regret my support of doing away with Glass-Steagall." Levitt said that the Volcker Rule would not have prevented the market meltdown, and he termed the Dodd-Frank bill "a huge mistake."