The push for war on the part of the British Empire stems from their recognition that their system of rule—the monetary system—is dead. The intention to launch war has been most blatant since the murder of Ghadaffi under the guise of humanitarian regime change. Subsequent to that hideous act the timeline for transitioning into full-fledged general warfare, via staged conflicts in Syria and Iran, has been contracting and the efforts to stop it have become all the more important.

The arch of present events is shaped by this monetary empire's desperate attempt to force nations like Russia and China into submission over their defense of sovereignty of nations. However, the resistance opposing this war drive, primarily expressed by Russia, as well as key ranking figures in the U.S., has thus far been relatively successful.

Yet, it must be kept in mind that the more successful this resistance is, the more desperate the lunatics behind the drive become; thermonuclear annihilation is a very plausible outcome. The only final solution to end the stranglehold that the Empire has held is to end the Empire once and for all by ridding the planet of it's failed monetary system and returning to the principles of an American Credit system and physical economic development.

Get Involved, Call: 1-800-929-7566

In a provocative briefing to the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Director General Yukiya Amano told the body that "The agency continues to have serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear program....

As of 8 PM on Monday, March 5, the Prime Minister of Israel, British puppet Netanyahu had spent 3 hours in undescribed meetings at the White House, and still had not spoken at the AIPAC meeting. He will give some kind of speech tonight. The best way to cover the AIPAC events is to underscore and understand what Lyndon LaRouche said on March 4th, just after Obama spoke to the gathering.

In a full-page ad in today's Washington Post, leading former military officers told Obama that "Military action at this time is not only unnecessary, it is dangerous—for the United States and for Israel. We urge you to resist the pressure for a war of choice with Iran."

The cumulative Thermo-Nuclear Arsenal of the planet could very well turn into the mass extinction of the human species, any day now. This is not the product of a series of inevitable events but a conflict between the collapsing British Empire's drive for depopulation through their puppet Obama and the resilient emergence of a future orientated alternative in the Pacific.

In an exclusive interview scheduled to appear in the March 9 edition of Executive Intelligence Review, former Chief Inspector the the International Atomic Energy Association in Iraq, during the 2002-2003 period, Robert Kelley recounted the scandalous way in which incompetent accusations by one single low level analyst were used to provoke the war against Iraq, and argued that the exa

Vladimir Putin has become Russia's next President, winning nearly 65% of the vote. This is a historic victory. But, as LaRouche said last night, nothing in the strategic situation has fundamentally changed. With leaders in the USA having failed to remove Obama from office, we are in immediate danger of thermonuclear war now.

Moody's downgraded Greece to its lowest level on March 2, because it expects the much ballyhooed "haircut" negotiations to end in a default this coming week. Thursday, March 8, is the deadline for Greece to announce what percentage of its bondholders have "voluntarily" agreed to the terms of their haircut.

China's Foreign Ministry issued today an official six-point framework "for realizing a political solution" in Syria. "China follows closely the developments of the situation in Syria, firmly maintains that the current crisis should be resolved through political dialogue in a peaceful and appropriate manner, and has made unremitting efforts to this end."

The following statement was issued by Lyndon LaRouche in the wake of the Russian Presidential elections.

"Nothing has changed. Over 82% in Russia have voted against the enemy, but nothing has changed from what I have said over the past several months, that thermonuclear war is on the table.

A consistent theme running throughout the decades-long history of U.S.-British nuclear cooperation has been the British insistence on having a veto over U.S. nuclear weapons use, while not allowing their own arsenal to be subject by a similar U.S. veto. As far back as the 1943 Quebec Agreement, the British were demanding a veto over use of the bomb by the U.S.