Helga Zepp-LaRouche at Rhodes Conference: "For a New World Economic Order"
October 14, 2008 • 2:07PM

For a New World Economic Order In the Tradition of the Peace of Westphalia -

by Helga Zepp-LaRouche

This conference is taking place at a time when even the previous advocates of the thesis that "there in no alternative to globalization," acknowledge in terror that we are in the middle of the meltdown of this globalization, and in the middle of a chain reaction of events that threaten in a very short time to bring most of world production and trade to a standstill.

It is therefore a highly important step in the right direction, that President Sarkozy, at a meeting last Saturday with the heads of government of Germany, Italy, and Great Britain, and European Union representatives, announced the convening of an international conference, using the precedent from the conference convened by Franklin Roosevelt in 1944 in Bretton Woods, to lay the basic foundations for a new financial architecture. Nothing is more urgent than this. It is also long overdue that this must be a meeting of the so-called G-14 states, and that, among others, China, India, Brazil, and South Africa should be incorporated.

It is now thus all the more important to reach a common understanding of the theoretical fundamentals and principles, upon which the new financial architecture must be built if it is to be successful. Anybody who thinks it is sufficient merely to have a few "new rules" for the hedge funds and rating agencies, suspension of the EU's Maastricht Stabilization Pact in order to clean up the banks, and punitive re-compensation of the income of executives of failed companies, is mistaken.

If the world is to escape the danger of a collapse into a New Dark Age comparable only with that of the 14th Century, then the new financial system must be constructed on the basis of a qualitatively different paradigm than that of failed globalization. To attempt just to remove the most obvious, wild excesses, so as to find the quickest shortcut for returning to the old maximization of profit, can only end in catastrophe.

The parallels to the financial collapse of the 14th Century and the ensuing dark age certainly merit reflection: At that time, banking houses like the Bardi, Peruzzi, or Accaiuoli had taken over all aspects of economic life, from the financing of the court of the King of England, of the aristocracy, to the military, agricultural production, and trade, and they operated according to the principle of profit maximization without the slightest regard for the common good, such that they plundered it beyond the point at which it could still survive. They acted like a cancer which, in order to grow, takes over more and more of its victim, until the patient dies. In the end, the English King Edward III canceled repayment of accumulated debts: That was the straw that broke the camel's back, and the banking houses collapsed.

A collapse of civilization resulted, in which one third of the population between India and Iceland was decimated. The combination of the Black Plague, failed harvests, hunger, superstition, witch hunts, and Flagellants meant a collapse that became known as the "New Dark Age." The paintings of Hieronymus Bosch vividly convey the insanity which dominated this era.

The methods of the investment banks, the hedge funds, the private equity firms in the era of globalization, are doubtless orders of magnitude more complex and sophisticated, due to the advances of the electronic age. And, though they operate "globally," the principle has remained the same: the highest possible profit maximization through control of scarcity. The principle "buy cheap, sell dear," and the maximum extraction of profit in the "shareholder value" society, have led to, on the one side, to thousands of dollar billionaires and over 10 million dollar millionaires; but on the other side, billions of humans living below the minimum required for human existence.

Additionally, since the invention of "creative financial instruments" by Allen Greenspan, massive sums have come into existence, whose dimensions seem to belong to the domain of astronomy: three-digit trillion or perhaps quadrillion in outstanding obligations. Due to a lack of transparency, in particular with respect to over-the-counter (OTC) trades, no government and no central bank has an accurate picture.

Most recently, since the outbreak of the so-called mortgage crisis in the U.S. 14 months ago, it has become clear to most insiders that a large part of these 16-digit-plus "assets" is in fact "toxic waste." The French magazine Marianne has just released figures only previously publicized by Executive Intelligence Review: the $1,400 trillion market in derivatives is 50 times as big as the GDP of the world economy. The attempt to honor this financial paper at 100% value, as the U.S. Administration is now trying to do with the Paulson plan, which is by no means limited to $700 billion and is actually open-ended, can only lead to a rapid hyperinflationary disintegration of the world financial system. The events in Germany of 1923 now threaten to play out on a global scale!

Even if you take into account the impressive scale of incomptence of the greed-blinded investors, it must have been clear to the chief culprits that the unrestrained extension of mortgages to people without any down payment, would necessarily lead to a collapse of the mortgage and real estate markets at the moment interest rates rose on the credit markets. And now it is also clear to them that hyperinflation will destroy the savings and living standards of the majority of the population, and, threatens famine on a scale never before encountered. If this problem is not immediately solved through a reorganization based on the right principles, it threatens to bring on a collapse of humanity into a dark age in which billions could be victims.

Now, it is a well documented fact, that my husband, the American economist Lyndon LaRouche, has for a long time, and at every branching point, correctly forecast the accelerating tendency towards a systemic collapse of the financial system, on the basis of the axiomatically flawed decisions that were made, including the promotion of consumerism in the U.S. of the 1950s, the elimination of fixed exchange rates and of the Bretton Woods System by Nixon in 1971, or the crashes of 1987 and 1997. On July 25, 2007, three days before the outbreak of the mortgage crisis, he explained in his now famous web-cast, that the financial system had already collapsed and was hopelessly bankrupt, and that from now on, one would just see various aspects of the bankruptcy rising to the surface.

I mention this, because in a situation so dangerous for humanity as this, it is better to listen to the solutions proposed by the economist who for decades has correctly analyzed the problem, rather than those who until recently denied the systemic character of the crisis, or who still in August were saying, "The worst is already behind us."

Such an emergency conference, modeled on the Bretton Woods Conference of 1944, has long been proposed by Lyndon LaRouche, but he above all pointed to the difference in the conception of Bretton Woods intended by Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and what was in principle a Keynesian system, which was implemented by Truman after Roosevelt's death. It was Roosevelt's intention to use the Bretton Woods System to end forever the colonialism of the British Empire. Exactly this intention of Roosevelt must be implemented today with the New Bretton Woods.

In order for this new system to have credibility and integrity, the initiating powers—the U.S.A., Russia, China, and India—have to build the core of a representative group of nations which, in the tradition and spirit of the Treaty of the Peace of Westphalia, decide on a multicultural and multinational credit system, while at the same time, the current monetary and financial system is put through an orderly bankruptcy process.

Because of the above-mentioned volume of outstanding obligations, it cannot be merely a matter of "new rules" for hedge funds and rating agencies. Instead, the financial system must be put through an orderly bankruptcy proceeding; the majority of the debts and speculative contractual obligations must be written off. Simultaneously, a system of fixed exchange rates must be established, along with National Banks for the creation of credit-lines for productive investment.

The key to success of the reorganization, is that the new system, as a credit system, orient itself to the right, anchored in the U.S. Constitution, for sovereign government creation of state credit, as demonstrated by the first Treasury Secretary of the United States, Alexander Hamilton, and his founding of the National Bank of the United States. In the U.S. the government can, through the Treasury and with the authorization of the Congress, create credit, which in this way become legal means of payment.

The second way for credit creation to occur is by means of international treaties, which are also voted upon by Congress. Therefore, such treaty agreements of a group of leading nations with the United States, would become formally the turning point upon which to build the alternative to the recent, ever more dramatically escalating crisis. If a representative group of nations agrees upon a new system of credit, customs, and trade agreements, then that is already a "New Bretton Woods System"—and the last chance to prevent the risk of chaotic collapse that is becoming more dramatic every day.

The new system must be based on fundamentally different principles than the just collapsed system of "globalization." The outsourcing of highly qualified jobs and production capacities to so-called "cheap labor countries," with significantly lower wages, poorer infrastructure, lower taxes and lower standards of living, has not paid off for either the industrial nations or the developing countries. For example, the U.S., as a result of this policy, no longer has medium-sized industries, while China, which has produced so much for export to the U.S., cannot cover the real costs of total national production with its export earnings.

Thus, despite the high growth rates of recent years in China, almost 70% of the population has not yet been freed from relative poverty, China is not being paid enough for its export goods, not only to cover the costs of its cheap labor, but also to cover a part of the costs for the reproduction of society as a whole. And not only is the Chinese export market in the U.S. and elsewhere now endangered, but the escalation of the crisis threatens an escalation of the crisis through a massive loss in the valule of the export earnings that have accumulated as currency reserves.

That was exactly how "market prices" ruled under conditions of globalization for most nations, but especially those subjected to diverse forms of monocultures, which meant a de-facto "primitive accumulation" of the national economy as a whole. In the new system, therefore, "fair prices" must be defined, which not only make possible a strong, protected internal market for industry and agriculture by means of protective tariffs, but also take into account the costs of an optimal health and educational system.

In contrast to the insane and recently failed assumptions of the free traders, the real source of wealth in society is solely the creative capacity of man, which continually empowers him, through the discovery of new physical principles, to expand his knowledge of the laws of the universe. When this scientific and technological knowledge is applied to the production process, it leads to an increase in the productive powers of labor and production capacities, which in turn leads to an increase in the standard of living and life expectancy.

The fact that a world population of a few million humans at the time of hunting and gathering societies, could develop to today's six and half billion human beings, is proof that in the application of these discovered universal principles in production processes, productivity increases in magnitudes that are significantly higher than the costs applied to the discovery, and the investment in its application. For sure, the general principle of progress is also a necessity, as at every stage of development, the natural resources are relatively limited, and only by means of new qualitative discoveries, can new resources be defined.

Human creativity is thus the motor for the increase of relative potential population density, which in turn is the necessary precondition for the long-term survival of human species. The increase in relative potential population density is therefore the measuring rod for economic policy decisions. The Russian physicist Pobisk Kuznetsov said once that discoveries are always named after the author of the discovery, as with "watt" and "ampere," so would the concept of relative potential population density, as an economic measure, go down in history as the "La," for LaRouche.

The paradigm of the new system must thus place the maximum promotion of human creativity at the center. A nation oriented to the common good will see as its most self-evident interest, promotion of creative capabilities of all its citizens and above all its children and youth. Such an orientation would not only promote those scientific and technological areas which, as "science drivers," optimize the character of the economy, but it would also expand the role in the universe of what Vernadsky called the Noosphere. That means, it would further the process of the human race "growing up."

The New Bretton Woods must also be built upon the principles of the Peace of Westphalia, which in 1648 ended a 150-year period of European war, including the Thirty Years War. The most important principle of this treaty, upon which international human rights are based, was the idea that for the cause of peace, all foreign policy must be immediately oriented to the "advantage of the other." The warring parties had realized, that were the war to continue—a war in which whole areas of Europe had been decimated—nobody would be left to enjoy a victory.

Earlier, Nicolaus of Cusa in the 15th Century had laid the philosophical foundations for international law, in particular the idea that harmony in the macrocosm can only exist when all microcosms can develop in the best of all possible ways, including viewing the development of other microcosms as in their own interest. Accordingly, peace in the world can only be achieved when all nations have the chance to realize the potential within them and their citizens, and simultaneously to promote the development of other nations. That was the same core idea upon which John Quincy Adams based his foreign policy, of a Community of Principle among fully sovereign republics, which are in turn bound by a higher interest of humanity.

We have now arrived at a point in history, at which we are confronted with the challenge with which Alexander Hamilton, in the Federalist Papers, was confronted in his time, for the United States: namely whether we are capable of giving ourselves a goverment and a political order, which functions and is worthy of human dignity—but this time, for the whole world. At a point where the possible collapse of humanity confronts us all too clearly, can we promptly and in common, act to give the world a political and economic order, in harmony with the Creation and the laws of the universe?

I think we can, and that this is the purpose of the individual, and of humanity!